Skip to Main Content

Information Literacy Teaching Resources

Scholarship as Conversation

Communities of scholars, researchers, or professionals engage in sustained discourse with new insights and discoveries occurring over time as a result of varied perspectives and interpretations. -ACRL

 

Knowledge Practices

Learners who are developing their information literate abilities

  • cite the contributing work of others in their own information production;
  • contribute to scholarly conversation at an appropriate level, such as local online community, guided discussion, undergraduate research journal, conference presentation/poster session;
  • identify barriers to entering scholarly conversation via various venues;
  • critically evaluate contributions made by others in participatory information environments;
  • identify the contribution that particular articles, books, and other scholarly pieces make to disciplinary knowledge;
  • summarize the changes in scholarly perspective over time on a particular topic within a specific discipline;
  • recognize that a given scholarly work may not represent the only or even the majority perspective on the issue.

Dispositions

Learners who are developing their information literate abilities

  • recognize they are often entering into an ongoing scholarly conversation and not a finished conversation;
  • seek out conversations taking place in their research area;
  • see themselves as contributors to scholarship rather than only consumers of it;
  • recognize that scholarly conversations take place in various venues;
  • suspend judgment on the value of a particular piece of scholarship until the larger context for the scholarly conversation is better understood;
  • understand the responsibility that comes with entering the conversation through participatory channels;
  • value user-generated content and evaluate contributions made by others;
  • recognize that systems privilege authorities and that not having a fluency in the language and process of a discipline disempowers their ability to participate and engage.

ACRL Information Literacy Sandbox

       Knowledge Practices:
  • Cite the contributing work of others in their own information production

  • Critically evaluate contributions made by others in participatory information environments

  • Identify the contribution that particular articles, books, and other scholarly pieces make to disciplinary knowledge

Cora

       Knowledge Practices:
  • Cite the contributing work of others in their own information production

  • Identify the contribution that particular articles, books, and other scholarly pieces make to disciplinary knowledge

  • Recognize that a given scholarly work may not represent the only or even the majority perspective on the issue

Misc. Resources

  Knowledge Practices:
  • Critically evaluate contributions made by others in participatory information environments;

  • Identify the contribution that particular articles, books, and other scholarly pieces make to disciplinary knowledge

  • Recognize that a given scholarly work may not represent the only or even the majority perspective on the issue

Credo View